TrueToad Digital Imaging, News and Reviews, Nikon, Camera Lens Reviews, Nikkor
Search
Nikon 105mm Macro vs Tamron 90mm Macro
TrueToad / Saturday, August 25, 2018 / Categories: Reviews

Nikon 105mm Macro vs Tamron 90mm Macro

Two Super Macro Lens Compared

Bottom Line Upfront (BLUF): I highly recommend you consider a Tamron 90mm SP VC USD macro lens.  It is a top shelf Macro lens and Tamron has done an excellent job in producing this high-quality piece of glass.  This lens excels as a macro and general purpose lens.

I originally tested this lens back in 2017 and shortly thereafter bought my own copy even though I own the very nice Nikkor 105 macro.  I found the Tamron to be easier to use *not bulky, the colour and contrast from the Tamron is simply wonderful.a 

In this article I will compare two Macro Lens that are renowned for their abilities, the Nikon 105mm f2/8 VR Macro and the Tamron SP 90mm Macro f/2.8 Di VC USD, both lenses are considered top performers. I will have side by side images taken under the same conditions and lightings to show the results from both Nikon 105mm Macro and the Tamron 90mm Macro.

Below in the grid are the technical specifics of both the Nikon 105 and Tamron 90. Tamron not only is smaller, lighter but over $200.00 cheaper 😊 and that made me very happy. 

 

 

 

 

Nikon 105mm f/2.8 Macro  Tamron SP 90mm Macro f/2.8 VC USD 

Which is Better on Paper

Nikon 105

Tamron 90

Price

$899.95

$649.00  (FO17 Model)

-

++

Warranty  5 years 6 Years  + ++

Construction

Mostly Metal

All Metal

+

++

Weather Sealed

Yes & Rear Gasket

Yes & Rear Gasket

=

=

Focal Length

105mm

90mm

Subjective

Subjective

Angle of View

23 degrees

27 degrees

Subjective

Subjective

Max Aperture

f/2.8

f/2.8

=

=

Min Aperture

f/32

f/32

=

=

Aperture Blades

9

9 circular type

=

=

Min Object Distance

12 inch (.314m)

11.8 inch (.3m)

+

++

Macro Ratio

1:1 (life-size)

1:1 (life-size)

=

=

Front Filter Size

62mm

62mm

=

=

Front Filter Material

Plastic

Metal

=

+

Length

116mm (4.6 inch)

114.6mm (4.5 inch)

+

++

Weight

720 g (25.4 oz)

610g (21.2 oz)

+

++

Special Glass Elements

1 ED

1 LD, 2 XLD

+

++

Optical Construction

14 elements 12 groups

14 elements 11 groups

Subjective

Subjective

Image Stabilization

Yes VR

Yes VC & Gyro

+

++

Coatings

Nano & Super Integrated Coatings

Fluorine, eBAND, BBAR

=

=

Focus Motors

Silent Wave

Ultra-Silent

=

=

Focus Type

Internal

Internal

=

=

Nikon 105mm f/2.8 Macro Lens Performance Chart

Nikon 105mm f/2.8 Macro Lens Performance Chart

 

As you can see from the “ON_PAPER” comparison above, the Tamron should be a strong consideration and in most areas edges out the legendary Nikon 105mm Macro.

Here are a few images shot with a Nikon 105mm and the Tamron 90mm - same ISO shutter and f/stop.

Nikon 105MM   Tamron 90mm
Full Crop Fly - Nikon

Full Crop Fly - Nikon



Full Crop Spider - Tamron

Full Crop Spider - Tamron

 
Hand Help Nikon

Hand Help Nikon


Handheld Tamron 90mm

Handheld Tamron 90mm


Bumped Contrast for Details - Nikon

Bumped Contrast for Details - Nikon


Bumped Contrast for details - Tamron

Bumped Contrast for details - Tamron

 

Both Nikon and Tamron have been manufacturing macro lenses for a long time, and both companies have fans of their Macro lens products.  I own and use both of these lenses now, and find myself reaching for the Tamron over the Nikon for my macro work. Out in the field both handle very nicely and weigh close enough that you may notice Nikon is a bit heavier. Because I  carry a 7-pound lens for my wildlife photography, when people ask me is this Macro heavy I say no, @ 1.5lb approx., these are on the smaller side for their focal length.  Both lenses are easy to hand carry and shoot without becoming overly tired, and that brings us to the optical/image stabilization:

Tamron VC: Tamron uses what they call XY VC image stabilization that can compensate side to side and laterally – similar to what Nikon refers to as Sports VR used on Nikon’s higher-end Super Telephotos.  In this regard, I can state the Tamron has remarkable stabilizing abilities for handheld shots, again and again - the VC nailed it. Take a look at the photo above, that was handheld. Plus Tamron's VC is silent, or soo quite at least I don't hear it or any noise picked up in the video.

Nikon VR: Nikon 105mm lens use Nikon's traditional Vibration Reduction (VR) which is a mainstay on their newer lenses. Being a user of many Nikon lenses with VR I find the Nikon 105mm Macro does an adequate job to help me get handheld photos. There is some chatter during operation. While the Tamron VC is nearly silent.

Who has the better Image Stabilization? Hard to measure, but my basic testing shows that Tamron is better and if sound matters - Tamron is a clear winner.  Nikon claims 3  stops, while Tamron claims 3.5 stops, but from my experience, I am very impressed by how well Tamron performs. I seem to get better results with Tamron when hand-holding – but, remember 90mm is not 105mm, Tamron seemed to have push image stabilization to the next level. Tamron uses an accelerometer with a gyro to detect shake/movement on XY axis.

Image
Manual and Automatic Focusing: Nikon 105mm Macro and Tamron 90mm SP Macro are fast and quite. I find the Nikon performs better autofocus in lower light while the Tamron performs better overall in normal lighting conditions. I hear very little motor noise from either – whisper quiet, and this is good news for video users. Both lenses offer focus over-ride from automatic focus to manual focus, and both lenses have large, firm, responsive focus rings.  * Tamron focus rotates opposite from standard Nikon lenses, and so, you may find yourself focusing out when you should be going the other direction.

Focus Speed: I find the Tamron SP 90mm better overall. Tamron is super fast and almost silent in the operation.  Looking through the viewfinder from near to far focus is ridiculously fast.

Focus Limits: This is where Tamron got it right. I don’t understand why Nikon does not have a three focus position limiter on any Nikon lens, to my knowledge. Setting the lens to a specific distance makes sense in controlled situations.  Tamron offers three limits while Nikon provides 2 (near and far). On the Tamron you can set the focus limit to near out to 5meters, or limit the focus to middle distance, or full range.

Focus Breathing: Both the Nikon 105mm and Tamron 90mm shows some focus breathing; Focus breathing causes the image size to change as you focus, slight but still present.

Outdoor Weather Sealing: I feel confident both are outstanding as far as lenses go. Tamron claims throughout the glass to have water and dust seals. While Nikon lists the Nikon 105 lens as “weather sealed”. One thing that cuts down on dust entering your lens is “Internal Focus, ” and both Nikon 105mm Macro and Tamron 90mm Macro have internal focusing.  Tamron uses the Fluorine coating for the exterior lens – this is great! Nikon uses Fluorine on some of their lenses but not the 105mm. Fluorine makes glass very resistant to dust and water, stuff slides off or is easy to wipe off without streaks.

Optical Performance: Both Nikon 105mm Macro and Tamron 90mm Macro are very sharp lenses across the entire focus range. Now, splitting hairs and this is where we either need specialized equipment or make a judgment call based on our experiences and images over time. 

                The Nikon 105mm Macro is renowned as a macro lens and no one states otherwise it has a long history of being a very sharp macro tool. I love the results you get with this lens and rarely are any images not sharp due to optical performance. Nikon uses Nano and Super Integrated Coatings to help improve optical performance in tricky lighting, but read the next statement about Tamron.

                The Tamron 90mm Macro is also renowned as a macro lens and has a long history optically. I honestly feel the Tamron 90mm SP Macro lens outperforms the Nikon optically.  Tamron touts more LD an XLD glass elements throughout the lens and uses coatings that are claimed to reduce glare, ghosting, and anti-reflection, called Extended Bandwidth & Angular-Dependency on top of BBAR – Broad-Band Anti-Reflection coatings.  In bright lighting conditions or is reflective I get the impression that the Tamron 90mm SP Macro is superior.

Bokeh: Nikon 105mm Macro and Tamron 90mm Macro being f/2.8, neither are considered as head and shoulders over each other in this race.  But once again, Tamron used a nine-blade round diaphragm, making the background softer than Nikon's nine-blade setup. If you need creamy Bokeh - go for a Nikon 105 f/1.4 or similar. Both Nikon and Tamron are just about equal @ 2/8.

Build and Quality: Tamron 90mm Macro lens and Nikon 105mm Macro lens have been delivering top-quality performance and both lenses now originate from Japan. Tamron has made the most significant improvements in quality and construction over past years, and this example is outstanding when you pick it up and use the instrument. Build quality was an area Tamron needed to improve on – and they certainly did with the SP line.  Pound for Pound both Nikon and Tamron macros are remarkable in their quality and craftsmanship.  Tamron simplified the look without gaudy bands or placards, just a single silver ring at the base with a smooth surface.  The Nikon shell is tactile, positive feeling with a mix of plastic and metal construction using a slight bump texture.  I try not to bang my lenses around so; both seem to withstand normal professional use. Comparision between the two are subjective for which is better.

Future Proof: Nikon has camera Firmware updates, and newer Nikon cameras such as the D series have a way to calibrate lens focus.  But when using 3rd party lenses, you are at risk that the "new" Nikon focus algorithm will not be compatible with your lens. Tamron helps solve this with the TAP-in Console. The TAP-in console allows you to configure your lens. $60.00 option - the Tamron should have a coupon for 1/2 price off :( on the purchase.  I have not tried using the Nikon built-in lens calibration system - but if front or back focus is an issue, this may be an easy fix using it.

Where do you go from here: Sorry to be similar to others on the internet. I feel confident with this spectacular 90mm from Tamron It is a very nice positive experience for everything a Macro lens should be. Tamron 90mm SP f/2.8 Macro VC USD is a very wise consideration, otherwise, buy the Nikon 105mm f/2.8 Macro if using a Nikon camera body and have the additional $200.+ Dollars to spare. 


Print
Rate this article:
4.4
11061
Photographer's Notes
Tamron 90mm SP Macro Lens Nikon 105mmm Macro Lens
Lens
  • Tamron 90mm f/2.8 SP VC USD
  • Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED Micro
Camera Body
  • Nikon D500
  • Nikon D810
Original Date10/25/2017

TrueToadTrueToad

I live at the edge of the forest in semi-moist locations, I enjoy larva, and other delights. Although I am toothless and mostly warty, I am a sight to see.

Other posts by TrueToad
Contact author

1 comments on article "Nikon 105mm Macro vs Tamron 90mm Macro"

0
0

TrueToad

12/15/2017 12:02 PM

Shout out to RL for pointing out the primary image was captioned incorrectly. Thanks!!

Please login or register to post comments.

x

Great Gear

Nikon D850

Buy a Nikon D850

Nikkor 400mm ED FL Lens

More Reviews Here

Fujifilm X-T3 Review

September is here and with it arrives the announcements of new exciting camera gear from all camera manufacturers. Here is my thoughts about the new XT-3!.. Read on.

Read more

Fujifilm XT-2 Camera Review

My thoughts about the Fujifilm XT-2 from a DSLR shooter perspective.  Why I think this camera line is amazing and worth your time and attention to take a few minutes... Read more
RSS
SiteLock
Copyright 2018 TrueToad Terms Of Use Privacy Statement
Back To Top