Search
Sunday, July 23, 2017

Reviews News and Information

Reviews on digital imaging, Nikon Cameras, Canon Cameras, Macro, Micro, Telephoto and Super Telephoto lens and all things photo optics and equipment, such as the D5, D500. My ambition is to provide useful and solid photography tips and information with the best real world reviews of all the photographic gear and astronomy equipment - that I use.

Daystar Calcium H-Line Quark Review
TrueToad / Sunday, July 16, 2017 / Categories: Astronomy, Reviews, Solar Imaging

Daystar Calcium H-Line Quark Review

Calcium H Line

I give this Product a Rating of: 4 Stars

Today is a good day because I now have my new Daystar Calcium H-line Quark and I am excited to give this Calcium Quark a try then share with you my experiences. Lets start with an intro into the Calcium filters. Technically speaking, you are peering into the very edge of the light spectrum that a healthy human eye can see. Named by Joseph von Fraunhofer, Calcium wavelenghts occur in the near-ultraviolet at wavelengths of 3969 and 3934, and according to the Daystar literature the Calcium H line quark is suitable for both visual and imaging with a wavelength of 3968.8 but not absolute guarantee, but according to my eye I can see very distinct contrast more so than with any Whitelight & continuum filters I own, to include the top of the line Baader Herschel Wedge and Continuum setup or their Calcium K-filters. That being said, I generally do not spend too much time visually with this spectrum, and choose to do most of my activities with a camera for imaging purposes. 

There are differing opinions when people discuss Calcium filters for visual use - The general European Literature recommends this wavelengths for imaging only and discourage visuals and according to Baader the spectrum can be harmful over long periods of time when used visually, and is why their Glass Filters are for imaging only. Whatever the real dangers are as debated between the two theories of K and H wavelengths, I can attest the Daystar views are very comfortable to look at and show excellent details with high contrast with my setup visually, but again - I do not spend longs periods of time behind an eye piece viewing, I do so for a few minutes as reference for a quick view or two, then I configure the filter the for my imaging camera sessions.

The obvious questions I receive is there a big difference over the Baader Calcium K line glass filter that cost about $350.00 vs the $1200.00 quark? Truthfully speaking if you no ambitions of viewing in Calcium - get yourself a glass filter, my chart is below.  If you want a top shelf product then the Daystar Quark is worth the price, especially if you already have a HA Quark in your solar tool kit.

In my opinion if you are trying to save a few dollars - by the time you buy some solar film + the K-line filter + a ND filter you will be in it for about: $ 450.00 and if you only spend a few weekends a year in the white light arena then saving funds for other astronomy gear makes sense.  If you want to really experience solar imaging and observing as your passion - I would recommend the Daystar Calcium H line over the glass filter - the quality is superior in all regards.  I have used both and have the images taken with both a Glass K line filter and Daystar Calcium H Line, I do see a difference in the Daystar showing higher contrast and more details throughout.

In the field it is a very simple filter that goes either at the back of your diagonal or in front of your diagonal depending on your requirement for back-focus. I can get my setup to work either way for imaging but needs to go direct mounted to the telescope for visual in-focus travel to bring the disk to sharp focus.  With my 560mm f7 80mm Refactor I am just shy of achieving a full disk views using my ASI178 camera, and with a 20mm eyepiece I need to carefully position my eye to see around the disk, but with a GSO focal reducer all is well with a full disk for imaging. Please keep in mind all thread on filters need to go at the back of the Daystar not at the front due to solar energy load, so if you are using a focal reducer It needs to go on your eyepiece or camera nose piece.  

Also according to Daystar the Calcium H line Quark requires a refactor of f7 or longer - has a 25mm blocking filter with 21mm of clear aperture and this should be plenty of open aperture for amateur CCD cameras.

My visual set up requires me to remove my diagonal and mount the Quark in-line with the telescope in order to achieve in-focus, with the Stellarvue OTA and Baader accesories that is easy to accomplish. For imaging I can either mount the filter in the diagonal along with my camera or direct mount the Calcium Quark to the telescope and do imaging, either way it works for me with the correct set of adapters.

Pros:  An excellent filter for Calcium H line, showing high contrast sharp images. Visually, the views are stunning with enough filtering to reduce any eyestrain but enough brightness to ensure fast high speed exposures. The Daystar is a simple to use drop in solution for Calcium H visuals and imaging activities. It arrives out of the box ready to go, (you may need portable battery) can fit a 1.25 or 2" eyepiece holder but does require the optional battery to operate the Quark on band in the field; I can tell you even without the battery I get good results. 

Cons: Expensive, does not come with a battery pack, and USB Cable is too short in my opinion.

Recommendation: For Solar Enthusiasts who wish to have the best in class backyard Solar Setup.

Print
Rate this article:
5.0
61

TrueToadTrueToad

I live at the edge of the forest in semi-moist locations, I enjoy larva, and other delights. Although I am toothless and mostly warty, I am a sight to see.

Other posts by TrueToad
Contact author

Please login or register to post comments.

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message:
x

Buy This Lens

 

SiteLock
Copyright 2017 TrueToad Terms Of Use Privacy Statement
Back To Top